Evidence and limits
Finding: Configurable agents, tools, human input, and conversation patterns can compose multi-agent applications. The paper demonstrates feasibility and flexibility, not a general advantage over one agent or proof of governance.
Impact: Watch as implementation evidence. Do not promote conversational multiplicity into a coordination principle or performance claim.
Boundary: Pilot applications do not isolate when extra agents help, duplicate work, or amplify error. Next: what matched evaluation distinguishes coordination benefit from added calls and shared context?
Flags: builder-evaluated; no matched best baseline
Record State: Catalog review recorded; not a performance endorsement
What was reviewed: Structure and relevance screened; not a full evaluation