Human-generative AI collaboration enhances task performance but undermines human’s intrinsic motivation

Catalog evidence and recorded chart appearances. Inclusion is not an endorsement.

Source snapshot imported 2026-10-20. This is not a live feed. Source and contributions.

Evidence and limits

Finding: GenAI assistance improved the assisted task, but did not establish a lasting independent-performance benefit. In several collaboration-to-solo comparisons, intrinsic motivation fell and boredom rose more than in solo-only sequences.

Impact: Watch continuity and agency effects. Strengthen separate outcome, burden, and post-handoff measures.

Boundary: Professional-role simulations and short task sequences do not establish durable workplace effects. Next: how should a protocol distinguish a useful handoff from a reliance pattern that leaves later independent work worse?

Flags: short sequence; online-task transfer

Record State: Catalog review recorded; not a performance endorsement

What was reviewed: Structure and relevance screened; not a full evaluation

Inspect original source

Recorded chart appearances

  • 2026-10-13: position 54. Relevant to the recorded review topic (see source); Structure and relevance screened; not a full evaluation evidence
  • 2026-10-12: position 53. Relevant to the recorded review topic (see source); Structure and relevance screened; not a full evaluation evidence