Automation Bias: A Systematic Review of Frequency, Effect Mediators, and Mitigators

Catalog evidence and recorded chart appearances. Inclusion is not an endorsement.

Source snapshot imported 2026-10-20. This is not a live feed. Source and contributions.

Evidence and limits

Finding: Automation bias appeared across settings, while its frequency and mitigation depended on task, user, workload, accountability, training, and interface design.

Impact: Strengthen verification and accountability design. Reject alerts, confidence displays, or explanations as universal mitigations.

Boundary: Much of the evidence concerns clinical or legacy decision support and reporting was heterogeneous. Next: which mitigations transfer to open-ended generative work without excessive burden?

Flags: healthcare-heavy and pre-LLM evidence

Record State: Catalog review recorded; not a performance endorsement

What was reviewed: Structure and relevance screened; not a full evaluation

Inspect original source

Recorded chart appearances

No appearance in the chart editions included in this snapshot. This is not evidence of absence from other editions.