Evaluating Very Long-Term Conversational Memory of LLM Agents

Catalog evidence and recorded chart appearances. Inclusion is not an endorsement.

Source snapshot imported 2026-10-20. This is not a live feed. Source and contributions.

Evidence and limits

Finding: Long-context models and retrieval improved some results but still lagged humans on long-range temporal and causal understanding, question answering, event summaries, and multimodal dialogue.

Impact: Strengthen causal, temporal, and multi-session evaluation. Reject a large context window as proof of durable memory.

Boundary: The conversations are generated and edited rather than operational records. Next: which failures persist when the source of truth is versioned repository evidence?

Flags: generated and human-edited dialogues; no repository custody

Record State: Catalog review recorded; not a performance endorsement

What was reviewed: Structure and relevance screened; not a full evaluation

Inspect original source

Recorded chart appearances

  • 2026-10-13: position 39. Relevant to the recorded review topic (see source); Structure and relevance screened; not a full evaluation evidence
  • 2026-10-12: position 38. Relevant to the recorded review topic (see source); Structure and relevance screened; not a full evaluation evidence