Transactive Memory: A Contemporary Analysis of the Group Mind

Catalog evidence and recorded chart appearances. Inclusion is not an endorsement.

Source snapshot imported 2026-10-20. This is not a live feed. Source and contributions.

Evidence and limits

Finding: A group can coordinate knowledge through awareness of who knows what rather than by duplicating all information in every member.

Impact: Strengthen source ownership and knowledge-location routing. Reject central copying as the default continuity strategy.

Boundary: Human group-memory theory does not establish repository behavior. Next: how should source-location knowledge remain current when owners, tools, or artifacts change?

Flags: human-group analogy; no AI test

Record State: Catalog review recorded; not a performance endorsement

What was reviewed: Structure and relevance screened; not a full evaluation

Inspect original source

Recorded chart appearances

  • 2026-10-13: position 52. Relevant to the recorded review topic (see source); Structure and relevance screened; not a full evaluation evidence
  • 2026-10-12: position 51. Relevant to the recorded review topic (see source); Structure and relevance screened; not a full evaluation evidence