Evidence and limits
Finding: The abstract reports that repeated exposure explained several changes over time, while memory-based and survey-based personalization produced different disclosure and regret patterns.
Impact: Watch exposure and personalization mode as separate variables for the recorded review topic (see source) and the recorded review topic (see source).
Boundary: Five days of advice-seeking does not establish durable benefit, calibrated reliance, or a safe memory policy. Next: can an owning-system test separate exposure, current-session context, interaction-derived memory, and explicitly supplied profile data while measuring disclosure and regret? Candidate; source identity verified, abstract claims screened; not adopted
Flags: Abstract reviewed only; brief advice-seeking setting; exposure and personalization effects must remain separate; disclosure is not benefit
Record State: Candidate only: not accepted into the reviewed catalog
What was reviewed: Previously screened candidate; review remains limited